The relationship between Elon Musk and Donald Trump has never been quiet or boring. Yes! It was never boring, but instead, it has felt like something out of a reality show — part business alliance, part political partnership, part ego contest, and, yes, at times a loud “bromance.”
Over the last decade, Elon Musk and Donald Trump’s relationship has progressed through four distinct stages: early scepticism, a boardroom-style friendship, a messy breakup, and then a careful reset.
This piece I wrote for The Gazette News (Nigeria) breaks down that journey in simple terms, allowing readers to understand how two of the world’s most vocal figures became unlikely allies, rivals, and partners again.
Each phase reveals an important aspect of power today: how politics, wealth, social media, and personality now intersect in ways that were uncommon in previous decades.
Phase One: From Skeptic to Presidential Insider — The Early Bromance (2016–2017)
At first, Elon Musk kept his distance from Donald Trump.
During the 2016 election, Musk sounded unsure about Trump’s leadership style. He didn’t seem like someone who wanted to jump fully into partisan politics. Musk was still known mainly as the electric car and rocket innovator trying to change transportation and space travel.
But everything shifted after Trump won the U.S. presidency.
Trump began surrounding himself with big business leaders to strengthen his image. Musk soon joined two White House advisory councils, sitting next to America’s most powerful CEOs. It was a smart move for both sides.
Trump gained credibility with the tech world.
Musk gained access to the political heart of power.
And that is when the bromance energy first appeared.
Public photographs showed Musk attending meetings at Trump Tower and the White House. He didn’t shout or make speeches. He simply presented himself as a practical adviser seeking to protect innovation, jobs, and space exploration.
For a while, the partnership seemed calm and productive.
But the first big crack arrived in 2017 when Trump announced the U.S. exit from the Paris climate agreement. Musk, whose companies were closely tied to clean energy, strongly disagreed.
True to his word, he resigned from Trump’s councils.
He explained that climate change was important, and that America needed to lead rather than withdraw.
This was the end of Bromance 1.0.
They didn’t attack each other directly.
But the distance had returned — and this time it was emotional as much as political.
Phase Two: Shade, Subtweets and a Cold War — The Feud Years (2018–2023)
After Musk stepped away, the two men slowly drifted apart in public.
Trump focused on his presidency and political battles.
Musk focused his efforts on Tesla, SpaceX, and later his acquisition of Twitter (now X).
For a while, they barely mentioned each other.

Adamawa Women Raise N129m, Set N200m Target to Back Galadima’s 2027 Governorship Bid
Everything changed in 2022.
At a campaign rally, Trump called Musk a “bullshit artist”.
It was raw, blunt, and reminiscent of Donald Trump.
Musk responded online, telling Trump to “sail into the sunset.”
That exchange marked the moment their friendly rivalry turned into full-blown beef.
From there, the tone shifted.
Musk began openly discussing politics.
He talked about free speech.
He criticised political extremists.
He hinted that Trump shouldn’t return to the White House.
Trump, meanwhile, complained about censorship and unfair treatment while growing his conservative base.
Their relationship developed into what many observers referred to as a political cold war.
They weren’t friends.
They weren’t allies.
But they were still watching each other closely.
Because deep down, they understood something powerful:
Both men shape public conversation.
Both influence millions of followers.
Both represent very different types of power — political and technological.
And in today’s world, those forces often end up meeting again.
Which is precisely what happened.
As Trump prepared for another presidential run, reports began to surface of private donor meetings. Musk, who is wealthy, influential, and loud, quickly returned to the conversation.
The bromance wasn’t back yet.
But the door had reopened.
Phase Three: Power, Clash and a Fragile Reset — The Blow-Up and Aftermath (2024–Present)
The second wave of the Trump–Musk connection arrived with far higher stakes.
This time, Musk wasn’t just an adviser.
He had a global platform — X.
He had massive wealth.
And he had millions of politically active followers.
He began engaging more in political discussion.
Trump, making another presidential comeback, benefited from Musk’s presence online.
Then something happened that changed everything.
Musk openly endorsed Trump again, surprising critics and energising supporters.
Commentators called this Bromance 2.0.
Their partnership looked even stronger when Trump won the presidency again. Soon, Musk reportedly stepped into a larger advisory role, leading conversations about government efficiency and spending cuts.
It felt like the two men had finally aligned.
Until they didn’t.
The relationship exploded publicly over a major spending proposal.
Musk attacked the policy online, using strong language and warning about financial risk. Trump responded the way he often does — with sharp comments and personal jabs.
Suddenly, the bromance turned into another breakup.
Supporters picked sides.
Analysts debated what went wrong.
Social media became a battlefield.
For months, the relationship looked finished.
But politics rarely closes doors forever.
Through private mediation, shared allies and mutual interests, the tone gradually softened. Public moments showed them interacting again — not as best friends, but as powerful figures who understood they still needed each other.
Today, their relationship sits in a careful truce zone.
Not fully warm.
Not fully hostile.
But still deeply connected.
Because Musk remains one of the world’s most influential innovators — and Trump remains one of the world’s most polarizing political figures.
And neither can fully ignore the other.
What This “Bromance” Really Teaches the World
This story is not just celebrity gossip.
It is a window into modern power.
Here is what stands out:
- Influence now travels through platforms — not just politics.
Musk owns one of the world’s loudest digital megaphones. That matters. - Alliances are pragmatic.
Friendship can be less emotional—and more strategic. - Public relationships shape public opinion.
Their highs and lows become headlines. - Ego and loyalty still matter in leadership.
Perception drives reaction.
And most importantly:
This story is still unfolding.
The Elon Musk and Donald Trump relationship continues to evolve, sometimes friendly, sometimes tense, always loud.
It’s the modern equivalent of a political “bromance”: full of power plays, public drama, and unfinished business.
Final Reflection
Readers may not agree with either man.
Some admire them.
Some criticise them.
But nobody ignores them.
And that’s why their bromance-turned-rivalry-turned-reset remains one of the most talked-about relationships in global politics and technology today.
At The Gazette News (Nigeria), we pay close attention to these shifts because they influence policy, investment, communication, and society as a whole.
The next chapter?
It could be warmer.
It could be colder.
But it will almost certainly be loud.
And the world will be watching.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author, Vangawa Bolgent, and do not necessarily reflect the official editorial position of The Gazette News | Latest News In Nigeria & the World. Opinion pieces are published to encourage public debate and the free exchange of ideas. The Gazette News | Latest News In Nigeria & the World is committed to providing a platform for diverse voices while maintaining its editorial independence.
The Gazette News | Latest News In Nigeria & the World accepts zero funding from governments, corporations, or political parties. No advertiser dictates our coverage. No political interest shapes our investigations. The journalism you just read exists because readers like you chose to protect it. Every contribution goes directly into the field — paying reporters, protecting sources, and ensuring the stories that matter get told without fear or favour.
Funded by Readers
Us Right Now





